While the FAA rule did not apply to air cargo pilots, the FAA encouraged air carriers to voluntarily comply as well and improve the rest facilities for pilots while cargo is being loaded and unloaded. Every pilot is sharing the same air space and operating complex equipment; safety becomes a major concern. But air cargo pilots tend to run shorter flights than passenger pilots do, which means that regulations should not be the same for both fields. Cost of implementing the FAA regulations to the air cargo industry is also another major factor. This is probably why the FAA didn't enforce the rule in the first place.
Personally, I do not think that passenger carriers and cargo carriers should be put into the same category, just as the air cargo carriers' states that the FAA regulations should not be "one-size-fits-all." There are more lives at stake than there is in transporting cargo.
From a pilots' perspective, it would take them much longer in reaching the minimum hours required and from the managements' perspective it could lead to a financial loss due to a much slower process in transporting products.
Federal Aviation Administration. (December 21, 2011). FAA Issues Final Rule on Pilot Fatigue. Retrieved from
https://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=13272.
Federal Aviation Administration. (November 5, 2013). FAA Issues Final Rule on Pilot Training. Retrieved from https://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=15314.
Your Opinion on the exemption of the Cargo Carriers is similar as mine. I do also believe that part 135 should not be included in the same category with part 121 but at the end of the day, just like how you stated, they are operation in the same environment/airspace.
ReplyDeleteI agree with how cargo flights can usually be a lot shorter then making it harder for the pilots to build up flight hours. However, Passengers or not, the cost of the cargo, the aircraft, and more importantly the cost of losing the lives of the pilots if the airplane crashes is still a huge factor. Yes, the death count would be lower, but lives would still be lost and more cargo aboard equals more money lost by the company if they crash.
ReplyDeleteGreat post, I know at some cargo airlines the pilots would have to load and unload the aircraft, which could really make a person tired, then the crew has to fly the plan to drop off the cargo. A lot of pilots was calling fatigue. So some cargo airlines have hired load specialist, which have to load and unload the plane. So a lot of cargo airlines are doing their part to keep safety their number one priority.
ReplyDeleteAwesome post, but I would have to disagree on the cargo carriers running shorter flights than airliners. The company I work for now has some pilots working 24 hour duty days on certain flights. Im not sure if this is the same in the air liner industry. One of our legs we usually have is ANC to INC (roughly about a 17 hour flight if all goes accordingly) then a quick turn to HKG (about a 5 hour flight.. if all goes to plan). Once in ICN cargo is off loaded and on loaded so add another two hours.
ReplyDeleteIron Butterfly,
ReplyDeleteI agree that the new carrier regulations do not make sense from a management standpoint due to the loss in financial profits, and that there are more lives to be lost in passenger transport then in the cargo transport sector. I do believe that adoption of certain principles is necessary to make a safer and more effective operation, and due to the long routes with fewer abilities to rest, cargo pilots have more fatigue and are at greater risk to making mistakes.