There are many civilian drone purposes that are being used
in the U.S., this is due to keeping people safe. One purpose is that National
Park Service Units are utilizing drones for resource management and fire
management missions; for any other reason the use of drones are prohibited due
to wildlife interference. Another purpose would be relaying radio and wireless
internet hot spots to restore service after a natural disaster. When the
hurricane wrecked a telecom infrastructure in Puerto Rico, AT&T used a
drone called Flying COW (Cell on Wings). It provided wireless connectivity, such
as data, voice and text message services, this was a successful first time experimental
technology that was ever used. If you plan on flying for fun there are less
strict requirements, however if you plan on making money with your UAV, you
will need to pass a FAA test and receive Part 107 certification. To operate UAVs,
it should be below 400 feet and should be within the “line of sight” rule,
which mandates that drone operators must keep the unmanned aircraft within eye
shot always. It also should be under 55 lbs.; drone pilots must be at least
16-yr-old and unable to fly within controlled airspace near airports without
prior FAA permission, otherwise be at least five miles away without notifying
the control tower.
In Rwanda, about 30,000 people receive blood transfusions yearly. Once a
month, hospital would send out an employee to drive about three hours to
collect blood donations. That’s only if the roads are passable, due to weather
wiping out dirt roads in rural areas. A California robotic company based in
California are developing a plan in utilizing drones to deliver blood supplies
across Rwanda. Their goal is to make 50 to 150 deliveries a day to 21
transfusion centers. If the supply is running slow, the facility places an
order, then packaged in a controlled temperature storage bag wrapped in a
parachute. The drone has a speed of 50 to 85 mph to the facility, parachute
ejects when it arrives and then begins the return trip back. The aim of the
drone is to never have them touch the ground, just “drop and go.” The goal of
Zipline Company is to be the delivery service for the world which focuses on
delivering healthcare.
Yes,
UAVs currently play a significant role in aviation, they’ve become effective,
efficient, and affordable creating more jobs and economically beneficial. If
the UAVs level of safety to people and property in the air on the ground remain
the same importance as general aviation, then achieving this goal would become
quite beneficial. I believe there will be more rules or guidelines programs that
could only be confusing, since UAVs varies on what they are being used for, operated
by a public entity, commercial operator, or a hobby/recreational user. As with
anything that is new to the industry, laws aren’t up-to-date or coded for the
current situation. Ex: Prisoners are fighting over care packages delivered by
UAVs, but no one thinks about what if those drones are delivering bombs or
weapons to be used against the guards. This is getting out of control, guards
are unable to shoot them down due to the laws in place of using
counter-measures against them. They are also prohibited from using jamming
technology required to combat drones because of the current rules. The problem
isn’t a technological one, or a training issue; it’s a legal concern. The technology
exists, but legally, we aren’t allowed to use it.
UAVs are used in situations where manned flight is considered too risky
or difficult. They provide troops with a 24-hour “eye in the sky”, seven days a
week. Each UAV can stay aloft for up to 17 hours at a time, loitering over an
area and sending back real-time imagery of activities on the ground. The United
States Air Force range from small intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance
craft, some light enough to be launched by hand, to medium-sized armed drones
and large spy planes. Cost is the key debate when it comes to the use of UAVs
in war. They are cost-effective of achieving national security objectives. While
UAVs will never completely replace soldiers, this debate is becoming less important
in the current strategic climate. They do this creating low civil conflicts,
the end goal is inflicting high economic costs to the adversary.
Just when you thought operating a drone could be by a public
entity, commercial operator, or a hobbyist. They are currently looking for
someone to participate in drone racing, known as “Formula 1”. - https://www.indeed.com/cmp/The-Drone-Racing-League/jobs/Project-Manager-028dc953347da3f0?sjdu=QwrRXKrqZ3CNX5W-O9jEvWIuBcfYv3mrYLqkE6Hctuq0_HRJrovS1jvNqFNizQFCqmrPJY4GDejrn8YCKBD1aw&tk=1c5ur5olua1dacap&vjs=3. For someone who has just graduated from EMU
that holds a commercial pilot certificate and has knowledge pertaining to the
aviation field, this would be great for you
https://www.indeed.com/viewjob?jk=e5225bf84fb60574&tk=1c5vlt3pua1daeti&from=serp&vjs=3.
As I search for UAV jobs, there’s a great demand for anyone who holds a 4-year
degree and holds a FAA pilot certificate rating.
Brodkin, Jon. (November 6, 2017). An AT&T drone is now providing cellular service to people in Puerto
Rico. Retrieved February 6, 2018 from https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/11/att-drone-brings-lte-access-to-hurricane-damaged-puerto-rico/.
Federal Aviation Administration. (December 15, 2017). Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Retrieved
February 6, 2018 from https://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/.
The US air force is currently using the reaper and they're currently working on ways to use drone to deliver support packages when we have soldiers on the ground. They have many uses and they only cost about 13,000.00. They're also difficult to target, the drone pilots are highly skilled. The military is actually hiring drone pilots, and I feel like this will open doors to pilots who cant find jobs.
ReplyDeleteHi Iron Butterfly,
ReplyDeleteI've enjoyed your post on UAVs very much. The Puerto Rican Flying COW (Cell on Wings) was a particularly interesting and innovative use case of the technology. I wondered if they were used to fly the cellular equipment into an area for physical remote installation or if the UAV itself was loitering and providing an active node to the cellular network. In the later case I could only imagine that the UAV was a fixed wing variant due to the relatively limited flight time of rotary winged variants. I also wondered the total effective time of service and how much power would be required for the cellular network equipment alone, beyond the power required to keep the UAV aloft. Know you've got my interests piqued and I'll have to do some research of my own.
My favorite segment however was that you touched on Zipline International, Inc. and the work they are doing with the Government of Rwanda to bring life saving medical supplies to rural areas of the country. This UAV use case is probably the most impactful and inspiring application of the technology that I've encountered yet - saving lives through on demand blood transfusion and medicine drops to difficult to reach rural areas. Wonderful projects, both of these.
The prison drone care packages are an equally interesting use case. Technology will always be continuously leveraged, whether for benefit or detriment, it will be used nonetheless. As these UAV technologies mature many more interesting stories are certain to be had.
-Aviator in Progress
Iron Butterfly,
ReplyDeleteI liked the examples of the California company in Rwanda delivering blood for transfusions, and AT&T using the "Flying C.O.W." in Puerto Rico to provide cell service. Those are defiantly great examples of outliers in the UAV industry. I also agree that from a legal standpoint, we are unable to use all the technology that is available to promote and prosper the UAV world in the U.S. because of the laws not being up to the capacity of the technology. Hopefully there is a day that everyone can reach a consensus and agree on the practical use and restrictions for UAVs.