It’s a bilateral
air service agreement that the U.S. Government negotiates with other countries
to provide rights for the airlines to offer international passenger and cargo
services. It eliminates government interference in the commercial airline
industry about routes, capacity, and pricing, so airlines can provide more
affordable, convenient, and efficient air service to consumers. Emirates, Qatar
Airways and Etihad Airways have routes to 11 US gateway cities and there are
260 flights now serve the US every week from Dubai and Abu Dhabi. Persian Gulf
nations have spent about billions of dollars subsidizing their state-sponsored
airlines, this is a violation of the Open Skies Agreement. Due to their
governments’ help, they have been able to offer low fares to their customers
and increasingly expanding their operations into the US it’s to benefit their
own airlines, not the two that are originally stated in the US-UAE Open Skies
Agreement. This only puts American jobs in jeopardy as they expand their
operations in the US, it about 1500 U.S. jobs lost per route.
Delta, United and
American Airlines, dubbed the US3 have been receiving government subsidies, but
not just on the federal level but also on the state level. These US airline
companies have been receiving subsidies and are not up in arms because non-US
carriers are receiving government subsidies and it’s greater than what is being
given to the US carriers.
The discrepancy
that Emirates and many other carriers can borrow at low cost for aircraft
financing from the U.S. Export-Import Bank and similar agencies in Europe,
Canada, Brazil and Japan. However, such financing is unavailable to U.S. and
major European carriers. The foreign airlines are spending billions to purchase
wide-body aircraft so they can increase flights to and from the US and unfairly
compete against US airlines in the global marketplace.
In December 2017,
the US Department of Transportation finalized its decision to grant Norwegian
Air International approval to operate flights into the US. The Air Line Pilots
Association are outraged by this decision because it will create an unfair
competition and will ultimately result in the loss of US jobs and, potentially,
significant losses for the US international aviation industry. However,
Norwegian Air International are opening extra crew bases and plan on hiring US
pilots and crew for that. The airline currently operates 450 routes with 150
destinations around the world, they have also been named the best long-haul
low-cost airline in the world. It depends from what angle you’re looking at
this controversial arrival of Norwegian Air International, they are taking
routes away from US carriers at an exceptionally low fare but then on the other
hand, they will be hiring US pilots and crews. Also, they are purchasing Boeing
aircrafts, if the Open Skies Agreement is eliminated that will also put many US
jobs out of work.
The U.S. airlines
such as: Delta, United, and American are in a dogfight over whether the Trump
administration should crack down on the two addressing the billions of dollars
they claim Abu Dhabi and Doha are funneling toward their own their own
airlines, and as a result, undermining the US carrier’s ability to compete
internationally.
I have mix feelings
regarding the situation because the US airlines have received government
benefits in their own startup. I found facts that between 1918 and 1998 the
federal government spent $150 billion in support of aviation. Deregulation and
reduction in corporate welfare lead the industry into a more competitive
industry. As the US government directly allotted $928 million in loans to three
major airlines – Delta, United and American from 1957 to 1984 and the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) received about $55 billion to create and maintain
air travel infrastructure. Once again, every major American airline companies
had to be bailed out again by the government following the terrorist attacks on
September 11, 2001. But now because there’s another carrier the US carriers are
claiming unfair competition which unfairly spur their growth.
Debusmann Jr., Bernd. (October 8,
2017). ‘Open Skies’ vital to American job
creation, says UAE’s US ambassador. Retrieved March 15, 2018 from http://www.arabianbusiness.com/industries/transport/380579-open-skies-vital-to-american-job-creation-says-uaes-us-ambassador.
Stancy-Correll, Diana. (December 5,
2017). US airlines at odds over aviation
agreements with Qatar and UAE. Retrieved on March 15, 2018 from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/us-airlines-at-odds-over-aviation-agreements-with-qatar-and-uae.
Schaal, Dennis. (October 9, 2015). Wikileaks Disclosure Shows U.S. Airlines
Received Billions in Subsidies. Retrieved March 15, 2018 from https://skift.com/2015/04/09/wikileaks-disclosure-shows-u-s-airlines-received-billions-in-subsidies/.
Great post. Very good information and accurate numbers if we were to compare it to my own research. I have mixed feelings about the situation also. Middle Eastern companies are rich with oil money, like UAE, and that very much explains the success of their carriers. Over there, those carriers have small to little competition. Their system runs on carriers that are started and funded by governments not multi-billionaires like the united states.
ReplyDeleteIron Butterfly,
ReplyDeleteThis is a great post. I do agree with you that its mixed bag on how you look at the issue when it comes to the UAE and Qatar funding their airlines and Norwegian Air coming to the US. With as much money the Middle East makes with oil, of course they will have a more despensible income for airplanes over their US counterpart. As for Norwegian Air its good for the consumers that they are offered a lower air fare to get to their destinations but the company is also taking more routes from the US and also taking US workers.
I think you pose some very interesting arguments Iron Butterfly. As a consumer, I am very interested in flying on Norwegian Air, simply because of their very low cost. I can now travel to places that i would never be able to afford to go to. But as a pilot, I had found through some research that their pilots are not payed as well as other pilots in the industry. In regards to the export import bank, I feel as though the same discounts should be offered to U.S. carriers in order to be on the same level playing field in the market place.
ReplyDeleteIron Butterfly,
ReplyDeleteI think that your post is really well written and full of interesting facts. I personally think that what the US carriers are doing, which is to condemn the Gulf carriers of receiving subsidies is not fair at all. Well it is but it’s not. I say this because from my researches I found out that carriers such as American Airlines received millions of dollars from the federal government and until they were the ones receiving the money everything was fine. But now that the competitors, such as Emirates, Etihad and Qatar are receiving the subsidies, they are starting to call them out, which in my opinion is really unfair due to the fact that in the past the US carriers received generous amounts of money from the government, without even taking in consideration how some of the carriers took advantage of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy.
-Nenne747-
You stated that about 1500 U.S. jobs are lost per route. This is a shocking number! It's crazy what amount of damage these foreign carriers can do to our aviation industry when they follow these unfair practices, while we actually abide (as far as we know) by the agreements we have with them. The bad thing about them doing this with their airlines is that we really cannot afford to do this with our airlines due to our debt totaling over $20 trillion, while the UAE and other mid eastern countries are flowing with money from oil and can easily afford to do this. I wanted to take a further look at this detriment to our industry, but unfortunately didn't see which source this information was from.
ReplyDeleteIron Butterfly,
ReplyDeleteI really liked your post! I am also confused as to which stance to take. I feel that the US carriers are being unfair in their accusations because they have also been subsidized and work with subsidized partners. It is a very confusing and troubling mess, but hopefully it will be sorted out quickly.
I actually think the ME carriers are the ones being unfair in this situation. While U.S. carriers may have been subsidized, they haven't nearly received the subsidies that 1 airline has gotten in the course of a year. Governments have to support their airlines, but supporting them to the point where they can serve the most unprofitable routes. At least U.S. carriers end routes when they become un profitable.
ReplyDelete